etdanax.blogg.se

1. #Trump praises russia for hacking dnc server pro#
2. #Trump praises russia for hacking dnc server plus#

#Trump praises russia for hacking dnc server pro#

In a classic example of Left-think, the very people who have actually manipulated elections and played a rousing game of quid pro quo are accusing Russia and Trump of attempting to do the same while offering exactly zero evidence either that Russia was involved or that Trump was the intended beneficiary. The implication was that Trump is Putin’s choice and the American people should reject him in favor of Clinton. In a clear demonstration of not letting the facts get in the way of a good narrative, the mainstream media and the Clinton campaign saw this as a chance to continue beating the same tired old drum that the DNC had started playing in an attempt to draw attention away from the obvious implications of last week’s WikiLeaks disclosures.Īlmost as soon as it was reported that the DNC had rigged the primary race in favor of Clinton and had offered cushy federal appointments in exchange for large donations to both the DNC and the Clinton campaign, both the DNC and the Clinton campaign accused Russia of involvement in the hack to help Trump win the White House. presidential election,” or “urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state,” or endorsing “foreign governments meddling in America’s election and domestic affairs” or “inviting a foreign country to hack the US, and intervene in our elections.”

#Trump praises russia for hacking dnc server plus#

Given those two pieces of information - and the propensity of two plus two to always equal four - Trump could not have been inviting “a foreign power to use its hacking abilities to get involved in the U.S. Second, it is impossible for a foreign power - or anyone else for that matter - to hack something that does not exist. It essentially does not exist as a server any longer.

First, Clinton’s server - which was turned over to the Department of Justice last year - is out of operation. The New York Times went so far as to say that Trump was “essentially urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state.” NBC News said “Donald Trump asked Russia to help ‘find’ the missing emails from Hillary Clinton’s private server,” implying that he had “endorse foreign governments meddling in America’s election and domestic affairs.” ABC News - while mostly keeping to the middle of the road in its reporting - insinuated much the same sentiments, saying, “Many observers offered a swift rebuke, claiming that Trump had been essentially inviting a foreign country to hack the US, and intervene in our elections.”īut is this characterization accurate? Before the mainstream media gets too far ahead of itself, perhaps a couple of points should be illuminated. The Miami Herald was not alone in its claim that Trump was recruiting a foreign power to hack and leak.